🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.