🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.