🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," said one MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," said a leading peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this international debate continues, the actions of Australia and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.